- Your history
Paramo preparing us for an ECB silver bullet ??

Last Sunday (blog pick 1 out of 3), I took the liberty of freewheeling into the minds of our policy makers. We had already ruled out the EFSF or SPV/CDO option, both on grounds of credibility and political feasibility (Germany). But we also suggested that the ECB might be tempted to come into action but not as last resort buyer at general public request. Yesterday, my feeling was somehow confirmed when visiting a fixed income seminar hosted by JP Morgan Asset Management. When touching the subject of quantitative easing/money printing/shoring up sovereign distressed debt, AKA "bring out the bazooka", one of the key speakers elaborated a bit further on their Frankfurt visit the day before.
They had a long talk with José Manuel Gonzalez-Paramo, Spanish representative within the ECB's executive board. Paramo was quite open about the past behavior of the ECB - justification of no action - as about the near future. And the door for action was indeed not closed. The ECB is merely waiting for a clear political sign in the right direction. And if that sign comes, well, anything can happen.
The sign Paramo is referring to could mean 1 or 2 things. Primo, Merkel addressing German Parliament next Friday, preparing the audience for some kind of German altruism supporting the single currency all the way, but not entirely for free. And Segundo, details on this quid pro quo could be given during the 9 December EU summit : A joint move towards a euro-zone fiscal integration with a rapid change in various treaties to achieve this. Coupled towards more member state discipline and stronger supra-national policy action field (budget/economics) and supervision.
And if this should be the sign - after all a conditio sine qua non for a well functioning currency zone - the ECB could come into action on two fronts. It could lower interest rates further. Although not necessary nor to expect something big about it in business cycle terms, it's a kind of symbolic gesture of "benevolentia" towards markets but most of all politics : "you do your job so we can act accordingly", the law of communicating barrels. And if this should alter sentiment, they could do something extra by firing a silver bullet as a kind of Grand Finale: some well targeted considerable one-off purchases of government bonds. And in these markets, a silver bullet might be sufficient, no need for a bazooka : poor liquidity, no propriety trading in dealers' rooms and hence the only big time shorters in the market being London based leveraged vulture funds. An ECB move could cause a considerable short squeeze, with unwinding of positions very difficult because assets are hard to find, accelerating prices further up (yields down). Greetings from Frankfurt but more importantly a sign : instead of don't fight the FED, be careful as well when fighting the ECB.
But for this to happen, we need a credible political blueprint and a swift implementation of good intentions. And most of all, we don't need people crying out loud "where the hell is the ECB !". Rest assure, they are there, but they will only exit the cave when people stop making noise in front of the entry. And as a politically independent central bank, it should be like this.
One final remark : in a world where everything is manipulated these days by central banks (ECB a very minor detail), where it is hard to properly calculate risk premiums because of this behavior of zero-interest rates and artificially kept low long rates, you are fighting a lost war with honest weapons. And hence, before the Anglo-saxon press start shooting at the ECB for this possible unorthodox future move, they should also consider the following: the "voluntary structured" default of Greece with haircuts - so much co-orchestrated and criticized by that same professional written press - has been forced mainly out of systemic US risk motives. Because it wouldn't trigger a credit event and therefore wouldn't trigger CDS contracts to be honored. And hence it wouldn't trigger an AIG no2 style bail-out in the US. Because you can bet your life that those who were the major sellers of CDS premia on Greece are to be found right now in New York and London. And a Goldman Sachs bailout for example is something the world economy and more specifically some players can do without right now. Warren Buffet, to mention one of many. Another "tiny" moral hazard problem - one of some many - which still hasn't been properly addressed.
7 Comments
-
spaardertje
On 30 Nov, 2011
I don't think a silver bullet will be enough because the liquidity problem is just a symptom caused by a more severe insolvency problem. To solve that insolvency, mammy ECB will have to provide more than just a silver bullet.
Sure, bankers from JP Morgan Asset Management will join European leaders in their denial of the actual amount of shit they did not create and will not offload to the general public in the form of an ECB that will ultimately not have to do the big cleaning that is not necessary.
Until they are drowning in it.
Then, mammy ECB will be called in, and lots of fancy words will be produced to give an expensive explanation of the whole magical process. And the ordinary citizen will bow his head for so much wisdom and will hold his nose for all the shit he suddenly will find in his backyard.
And I agree: we are fighting a lost war with honest weapons. This war will be won with lies.-
christof Govaerts
On 30 Nov, 2011
@spaardertje
Maybe not enough but certainly something to scare some "evildoers" in the short term, buying precious time. Let the global race to ground zero and currency debasement finally kick-off ! FED today opening USD emergency swap lines for banks at 0,5%
-
-
spaardertje
On 30 Nov, 2011
Winning the war with lies:
In the depths of the financial crisis in July 2008, Treasury Secretary Paulson provided two diametrically opposed messages—one to insiders and one to outsiders. He told the official press that the Treasury was looking at the books of Fannie and Freddie, but expected to find that they’d be A-OK. He led reporters to believe that no “bazooka” would be required and that Fannie and Freddie would remain private. All that was for the outsiders—the American public.
However, the message to insiders was completely different. At a meeting of Wall Street’s finest on July 21, he talked about putting Fannie and Freddie into a conservatorship—with government seizing the firms and wiping out private investors. This was useful information, indeed, to Wall Street investors who might have some dogs in the hunt. A bunch of the attendees were Goldman alums. While speculators had been shorting Fannie and Freddie stocks for some time, the shorts peaked 3 days after Paulson’s meeting with insiders.
http://www.economonitor.com/lrwray/2011/11/30/more-secrets-of-the-temple-time-to-demand-transparency-and-accountability-of-our-public-stewards/-
Christof
On 30 Nov, 2011
@spaardertje
Yep, like goldman officially advising cdos @ their institutional sales desk while the prop traders of the bank were shorting the stuff big time. See also my blog too big to jail. A cynic might say that with draghi at the helm of the ecb, we might evn make some money out of this crisis !
-
ducdorleans
On 1 Dec, 2011
Interessant ... :-) / :-( (schrappen wat niet past) ...
was natuurlijk ook al duidelijk geworden toen de FED, na een harde strijd waarin ze de papieren eerst het liefst hadden verbrand, moest toegeven dat de hulp die ze AIG hadden geboden eigenlijk bedoeld was voor GS en de andere usual suspects ...
dat rapport is door het Congres hard bevochten, om er daarna ... NIETS/norson/nada/zilch mee te doen ...
that's the way of the world atm ...
-
-
Jeroen
On 1 Dec, 2011
Think it's time for the "ECB gold"-bullet, rather than a silver one.
-
christof Govaerts
On 1 Dec, 2011
@jeroen
that would be to much to ask. the art is to fire a silver bullit with the power of a golden bullit. and therefore you need a political signal first
















