Mr Market, EMU scenarios and credit status

Published: August 23, 2012 - 11:05
This article received :  15 Comments
28231_Germany-and-Euro.jpg

A lot of scenarios have circulated ever since the Greek debt crisis escalated and we got contagion into the Mediterranean periphery. And all these elements were related to bailouts, fiscal consequences of bailouts on core European countries (eg possible eurobonds etc), too big to bail (Spain/Italy) and rescue funds, whether or not the ECB would start the printing press and finally, a breakup. Considering these breakup scenarios, also variations exist : Germany leaving (and potentially some others) with a weaker EMU remaining and some hard currencies reappearing. Or the weaker being forced to leave and have them return to their old currency.

Now concerning these breakup scenarios, it's always interesting to know Mr Market's opinion because Mr Market in the end determines the return of portfolios for each and every one. So what has happened over the past couple of months and more importantly, what seems to be Mr Market's interpretation ? Finally, how has Mr Market valued Germany in this changing debate ?

Especially this last argument deserves some attention. The following table summarizes the period 20/07/12 until now. The reason I choose 20/07 is the fact that at that point, the crisis flared up in all intensity for a couple days starting with Italy and Spain transgressing again their psychological thresholds of respectively 6 and 7% on 10y government bond yields. Briefly, all hands on deck. In between then and now, we had some interesting developments taking place. First of all the warning of Moody's shortly after this event (23/07 and the future uncertainty of Germany and core Europe). This warning contained 2 elements, being a bigger burden to shoulder for the richer countries and the danger of a partial or entire breakup for European and global financial stability, also having an impact on the richer countries and their credit status. Then came the ECB preparing for a game changer and politics moving into the direction of going all in (ECB buy programs - ESM) with Germany seemingly willing to go all the way as well (see also Jorg Asmussen within the ECB changing tactics). Now how have things evolved as far as Mr Market's perception is concerned ?

Schermafbeelding 2012-08-23 om 10.01.36.png

Note : yellow means up while blue means down compared to 20/07 ; the shades of the color reflect the intensity of the movement.

First of all, core European yields went up. This could be a reversal of risk, the Moodys' comment on burden sharing having an impact on the core budgets, or a combination of both. The most interesting part however is the CDS or credit default swap evolution where it is clear that for all nations - Germany included - the CDS improved or the risk premium in basis points went down, this after the recent political developments took place. Now this is interesting : German yields going up and CDS going down, what is going on here ? Or, the future budgetary cost for Germany expected to increase while simultaneously its credit status as perceived by the market improves. Hhhmmmm. It seems to me that this could mean a thing or two and it basically involves risk and uncertainty. And it also reflects a part of the Moodys' statement on 23/07, with the fear for the unknown (uncertainty) coming up front. It probably means that for Mr Market, "cholera/plague" - being going "all in" in order to preserve the current EMU construction - is to be preferred to - for the sake of the metaphore - an "unknown disease". Because the "unknown disease" following an EMU implosion or breakup implies collateral damage hard to calculate, with an impact not only in Frankfurt but going from Tokyo all the way to Bejing, London and NY.

Now I always could be wrong about my interpretation about Mr Market's sentiments about these scenarios. If so, always feel free to join the blog debate.

15 Comments

  1. incognito 

    On 23 Aug, 2012

    the bund bubble deflates (a bit), that's all, or rather: in the 'new', macro-economic environment (post draghi 'it will be enough' comment), the 'healthy' (?) bund boom all of a sudden looked (a bit) like a bubble
    1. christof Govaerts 

      On 23 Aug, 2012

      @incognito
      That's 1 part of the story, question is why and looking at the other puzzle parts, this does not alter my view on Mr Market's interpretation of what is going on or what he likes to be the case
  2. Nacht Und Nebel 

    On 23 Aug, 2012

    Christof,

    Did we not have a game plan.
    1. Draghi says He will do anything....
    2.De Buba says No but we already know that that means yes.
    3.The same day the market goes down but only because they weren't as smart as us:)
    4;The day after Mr Market sees the light.
    5.Wait a minute says Mr Market if Germany says yes then Europe becomes New Bulge Area then we will have at least about 172 marshmellow plans that the north will "subsidize"
    5 If New Bulge Area doesn't fall apart we sell our German and Belgian bonds and buy PIIg bondss.Didn't we agree on that.Because they were shorted too much?
    6.What if they greece us thinks Mr Market and start the ELA printing press.They can print about 1000 billion thin air euro's .The f;ckers are playing with the hand of God.:(
    8If New Bulge Area doesn't fall apart then for the time been there is no reason to insure Piigs bonds .
    9.The next belgian bund auction will be a diseaster.The belgian chocolate frisco bund has melted :(
  3. Nacht Und Nebel 

    On 23 Aug, 2012

    10 If New Bulge Area doesn't fall apart there is not need to short the euro and the swiss can sell theirs will enough profit:)
  4. Nacht Und Nebel 

    On 23 Aug, 2012

    The rest we also know.The printing presses will roll and roll and energy and food will soon cost an arm and a leg.The governments of New Bulge Area are thinking that they will lend for nothing for ever and ever but stagflation is here to stay and then bunds collapse in 2015:(
  5. Theo 

    On 23 Aug, 2012

    Why are France & Belgium in orange ?
    1. Nacht Und Nebel 

      On 23 Aug, 2012

      Theo,
      Your right,It looks like France and Belgium are yellow with a red herring inside:)
  6. Theo 

    On 23 Aug, 2012

    OK sorry I get it.

    There is another scenario : we all know the outcome of the plague... but at the time of SARS (an unknown disease) nobody knew how that was going to play out.
    In the end only just 100 people died.

    When the core of the EZ are finished saving the periphery, who will save France & Belgium (the two country pretending to be from the core) and most importantly who will drive the growth the entire EZ will need if it is to ever emerge from this crisis?
  7. Nacht Und Nebel 

    On 23 Aug, 2012

    Theo,

    The only two thing able to grow in Belgium are the recurrent costs of the civil servants circus and the income tax rate.
    1. Theo 

      On 24 Aug, 2012

      A Belgian econometric expert originally from Bulgaria (been in Belgium for over 30 years) has developed the most simple and ingenious idea of how to combat ATM fraud.
      The guy is currently in Bulgaria to register the idea and do the whole thing in Bulgaria precisely because of the low corporate and personal taxes
  8. Christof 

    On 23 Aug, 2012

    @all
    Of course this was quite predictable in the assumption Germany would play along. It seems now they will have to, they will pay in any scenario which plays out. Now it will be interesting to see how it will be sold and at which conditions. In the mean time, the greek problem has been put in the closet, wait for thebtroika report in october because we absolutely don't want athens to dictate the agenda when other higher interests arevat stake !
  9. Christof 

    On 23 Aug, 2012

    @theo
    And of course your comments apply to the EZ. But don't they apply as well to the rest of the biggies of the developed world. So why should we act differently when we get punished for that while others are being rewarded. Again I don't approve but I can understand.
    1. Theo 

      On 24 Aug, 2012

      @ Christof

      Don't get me wrong, I'm all for it precisely because I understand the stakes and the bigger picture. I get fractals better than most people ! It's why I introduced the concept to your readers.
      What I'm saying is that we have to be realistic about the outcomes. By that I don't mean that it won't succeed (I was first to pick my Banker in the horse race)... I'm talking about the unrealistic contagion predictions (doom scenarios) and the even more unrealistic growth numbers predicted by governments such as ours during their budget bingo nights

      I'm all for it, but it has to be done right and every EZ country has to be involved and do its part. Which indeed means that Greece has to stop behaving like a child and once and for all decide whether it's in or out of an union. They'll have to start pulling their weight too. The EZ won't be able to do this if they have to drag a dead body all over the place. Greece had its fun and games for the last 5 years... Enough is enough. The serious stuff is about to begin
      1. christof Govaerts 

        On 24 Aug, 2012

        @Theo
        I never get you wrong dear Theo, and don't get me wrong on that -) ; I fully agree on the bigger picture, that was exactly my point as well. And indeed, there is a difference between high expectations and reality kicking in in a couple of years from now. It was already quite a hefty foreplay, I am curious how the main act will look like. Or more importantly, feel like -)
        1. Theo 

          On 24 Aug, 2012

          @ christof

          Who knows, we might all get play rooms, Mr. G :-) panic rooms are so 20th Century...
          Most people think China is in for a hard landing... I think they have been preparing for the global slowdown since last year. I think we existing in a world of Relativity, thus my guess is their landing will be on a goose feather mattress relative to those who still think the laws of physics don't apply to them
          Politics will be important - let's see if our "leaders" can step up to the plate or will be just as big cowards as back in the 1930s . We've seen a taste of that in Europe for the last 5 years.
          You were right, Thinking the 20th Century is the right book. I'll have to finish reading it

Post a comment

max. length of 1500 characters