- Your history
-
Stories
- Geert Palmers (3E) over klimaatopportuniteiten
- Geert Noels denkt niet dat het nog wordt zoals vroeger
- Geen nieuwe steenkoolcentrale in Antwerpen
- Gas: een investeringsparadox?
- Zal de ECB ook op haar velg rijden?
- Friday Fun : When Hayek meets the Indignados
- Friday Fun : Have a laugh and jump into the abyss !
- Friday Fun : 1939 - Via col vento !!
- 'Freak events' en klimaatwijziging
General Misery and General Empty
GM and GE have been declining steeply over the last few years. GE dropped already by 60% in 2009 to the level of 1991... And GM? Well, investors who bought the stock in the early 1960-ies have not seen any return yet.

GM has always been a problem child, but GE has been a poster child. The darling of investors, the six sigma icon of US managment skills, the AAA-company that served as an example.
So goes GE so goes the US?
GE is the company with the longest history in the Dow Jones stock index. It has been in the index from the start. It has outlived recessions, wars and stock market crashes. But now it is crumbling.
If GE is in trouble, it is not because of its manufacturing skills. The problems are mostly concentrated in the financing arm. GE is the world's biggest provider of aircraft leasing, and all different kind of financing services. GE Capitals, the financing arm, has given loans to mid-sized companies and investments in commercial real estate. GE had a market capitalisation of almost 600 bn USD one day, which have melted to around 71 bn USD today.
GE is also the biggest US issuer of commercial paper, making it vulnerable for financing. Although GE has been a AAA-company, for what such rating is still worth, it has received a 139 bn USD insurance in debt from the US government in October.
So, the activities of the financing arm are now threatening the stability of the world-class manufacturing activities.
GE is like the story of the US: once a great industrial nation, it diversified away from the 'know how to create' to 'know how to create debt'. This is now turning against the company/nation and ruining its value creating core activities.
GE and the US are now in risk of losing the
ir top quality status. Rating agencies might cut GE's AAA-status, they are unlikely however to ever dare to cut the US-government top status.

Looking at GE Capital's CDS-premium, the picture is frightening (it even increased to 20% today). The insurance premium against a potential default of GE's financing unit is skyrocketing. This looks like Fortis on the eve of its breakdown.
GE being the biggest issuer of commercial paper, this doesn't bode well for the markets.
For those who believe this is just idle speculation, remember that CDS spreads have been rather accurate in pointing to problems, and much quicker than actual reports.
5 Comments
-
Frank
On 5 Mar, 2009
GE is the crown jewel in many stock portfolios. It is the ultimate "buy and hold" share of the babyboomgeneration. Many babyboomers are in for a rude awakening when they are going to use up their pension fund. If GE ever defaults or needs a bailout, it's going to send a devastating earthquake through the finance world. What where these guys thinking when they got involved in risky debt securities?
-
koen2
On 5 Mar, 2009
What they were thinking? They were thinking dollars. Idem dito for Buffet, when he got involved in what he called 'weapons of mass destruction':
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aHc37dvgJRn4&refer=home
The cost of protecting against default by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway Inc. soared to record levels more typical of junk-rated companies amid concern the firm faces losses on derivatives. -
Luk
On 5 Mar, 2009
Yes. From his September 2007 letter to investors:
"The second category of contracts involves various put options we have sold on four stock indices (the S&P 500 plus three foreign indices). These puts had original terms of either 15 or 20 years and were struck at the market. We have received premiums of $4.5 billion, and we recorded a liability at yearend of $4.6 billion."
It's possible that (although those contracts don’t come for another 11 years) Berkshire does have to pay out =~ $40 billion.
As this is old news, I don't see the correlation with the recent soar of the cost of protecting against default by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire (except the plunging markets).
You can find his letter here:
http://www.berkshirehathaway.com/letters/2007ltr.pdf -
Theo
On 6 Mar, 2009
While doing my MBA in a B-School in Sydney (Australia) we had a seminar one day in Strategy and the guest speaker was Mr. Steve Sargent, CEO GE Au & NZ. An enthusiastic and energetic man, Steve went on through the current (2007) strategic developments of GE: letting go of plastics, concentrating on jet engines, setting up credit cards for retailers... I noticed that he didn't talk much about GE Money. Given the fact that it had provided most of its profits and was responsible for most of the profits I thought it odd. When the Q&A came, I asked him whether he thought the current GE business model wasn't built on shaky ground. Needless to say everybody laughed! But I persisted and elaborated: GE's business model was to make things and lease them or offer finance to clients to take them. in effect they were shifting assets from one side of the B/S to the other and deferring CFs. Yes, by financing the purchases your clients make you increase turnover at a rapid rate in a short time, but you loose control of your CFs, profitability and the sustainability of your entire group. After all you are not a Bank!
I never got an answer. Time was suddenly up and Steve had to go... he was a busy man you see.-
Ghazi
On 1 Feb, 2012
Little one labor and sarhtoge are inevitably bound together and if you continue to exercise the labor of children as the treatment after the collective malady of poverty, you inclination have both poverty and youth labor to the end of time.
-


















