- Your history
ECB verdict : "It's a complex thing"

Before giving a brief comment on what has been decided upon today, a quick quiz show. Who is quoted for the following statement earlier this week :
"Markets are not allowed to run wild and must serve the people rather than the other way around. When we look at international markets over the last five years, then we see that they haven't served people, rather they enriched a few, and many people around the world have paid the price for this. The main task for politics today is to bring the spirit of the social market economy into the financial markets so that international financial crises don't repeatedly ruin what people have built up with their own hands and hard work".
A) Mario Monti
B) Angela Merkel
C) François Hollande
And as usual in multiple choice, go for the middle answer, being B. Yes, Angela speaking before sister party CSU a couple of days ago. And that's why it's a complex matter, in the case of Germany even a paradox in view of the fact that Germany time after time has been hammering on discipline in order to regain market confidence. A very recent Reuters article by the way gives a nice summary on this split German feeling which may be is not so strange after all (http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/09/05/us-investment-germany-markets-idUSBRE88409I20120905). The title is already a good indication of what to expect : "Seek the trust of financial markets, but only so far as you can trust them".
The outcome today was no surprise except for the rate decision (no change & -0,25% expected). This was the public image exercise to please another building in Frankfurt. On the final outcome and the bond purchase program, some on the right will disagree but that will hold for some on the left as well because this compromise basically contains both sides of opposing economic schools of thought : It's printing all right but it's sterilized (ps : to some extent) ; It's helping cheaper governmental funding but it's conditional. Seniority of ECB holdings gone (recap ECB in the future if necessary ?). Is it the best of both worlds ? Only time will tell and time is what we have bought to give this project one last chance. Because in the end, and also mentioned by Draghi, it all comes down to politicians playing by the rules. Is moral hazard hereby addressed ? We will see how these arrangements are going be laid down in legally binding commitments. One final detail here : "Decision was not unanimous with 1 dissenter". Was it an Austrian, a Fin, a Dutch or a German member ?
From this Reuter' article, we leave you with 1 final remark coming from Bernard Speyer - Deutsche Bank Research :
"There are two views at work. First is that financial markets do not understand the constraints of policy or respect the primacy of democratic developments and governments must therefore enforce the latter. The second is financial markets by themselves are not able to find a stable equilibrium and that's another justification for constant government intervention, albeit one with a consequence of making markets even more volatile. This idea of using market forces to some extent, but in tandem with government direction or intervention, has been around since the euro was first devised. The monetary union treaty has both a "no-bailout" clause and a government administered "stability and growth" pact. This dual thread persists today. Germany demands reform and cuts to gain market trust, while developing an intergovernmental fiscal pact and agreeing intervention by the ECB or European Stability Mechanism to correct market skews. I think there's a grain of truth on both sides and if you take that as a foundation for the 'muddle through' approach of European institutions in this crisis, then it all starts to appear more strategic than at first sight."
Basta cosi, the best way to illustrate what happened today is probably to give the floor to the following singer song writer : Italian, born in Hannover Germany , wears a Napoleon hat (second hand Sarkozy it seems) and performing "Lord Jim" somewhere in Amsterdam :
20 Comments
-
Nacht Und Nebel
On 6 Sep, 2012
Mario's eternal can kicking machine. will run on thin air.One can only hope that is doesn't run out of breath!
It looks more like a con promise then a compromise-
christof Govaerts
On 6 Sep, 2012
@NuN
May be and fundamentally in the real world nothing much has changed. But when you take a closer look, today's speech was masterly conceived and accordingly played out. Sure it buys time, now we will see for how long politicians can and are willing to play along.
-
-
Nacht Und Nebel
On 6 Sep, 2012
Like a company in big financial trouble I would advice the ECB to change her name into First bank of. Nova Bulge Area simply because the name Belinfuus is already taken.
-
Joeri
On 6 Sep, 2012
Question from Zero Hedge: how can bond buying be "unlimited" if the ECB is by definition limited by its €3 trillion balance sheet since the transaction will be sterilized and the size of the overall assets will not increase? Does this also imply that the ECB will terminate its 3 year €1 trillion LTRO program prematurely?
Any ideas?-
christof Govaerts
On 6 Sep, 2012
@joeri
There are creative ways of evading the sterilization issue. About LTRO, I think here there is no problem. As I said before, refinancing operations (1 week - 1 month...? ) is completely within the ECB's mandate. It's just being the lender of the last resort towards the private financial sector (banks etc). That is something different from buying up government bonds.
-
-
Joeri
On 6 Sep, 2012
Christof,
perhaps a stupid question but how do you see the sterilisation work in practice? -
christof Govaerts
On 6 Sep, 2012
@Joeri
@Joeri
When the ECB buys bonds, money can flow back to the ECB under the form of term deposit. And here lies the trick : this liquidity (term deposit) can be used as collateral de nouveau !
-
Will
On 6 Sep, 2012
We are all sterilized ! All 500 million of us.
(= new word for fucked up)-
Christof
On 6 Sep, 2012
@will
May be, this is the price you pay to keep a nice dream alive, a unified europe. It's for politiians however the last train to jump upon before economic reality really takes over events. I am not judgemental on this one : without approving nor disapproving, i understand the compromise. And it was not an easy exercise but certainly cleverly played by some !-
Will
On 6 Sep, 2012
@Christof:
Sterilized in this example should mean that equal amounts go IN and OUT in the agreed time period.
But...where is Spain going to get the money to pay back the ECB when that money dissappeared as it does now? For a country in a depression? In my opinion this can only happen when the Euro goes to 0,80$ when the time is ripe for payback.
And being short term bond buying (max 3 years) this can mean that the Euro sinks in that period....to peseta level. Madre de D. !-
Christof
On 7 Sep, 2012
@will
Fair value of the euro is around 1.15/1.20 in real life, meaning as long no accident happens on fin markets and flight to quality pushes everyone towards the USD. Now uncle sam is doing a great effort to pressure the USD so it would really take some time to reach 0.80. Spain is the problem, not italy and after today portugal and ireland have an escape as well. Today bought time to turn sentiment and to warn shorters against the euro, that's all. And it seems the markets have understood the message-
Will
On 7 Sep, 2012
In my book, today's action from Draghi, is another ploy like the one that was used in Greece, to enable big banks to get their money out of Spain.....
-
christof Govaerts
On 7 Sep, 2012
@Will
Not quite sure about that, on the contrary. With this "potential" bazooka - meaning conditional because governments need to pull their pants down first in order to receive ECB bond support - we have a sentiment changer. And when sentiment turns positive again, capital which fled certain countries can return to home base. In the case of Greece you are probably right. When alarm bells were ringing in 2010, the crisis dragged on, exactly because German and French banks were the ones with the largest exposure. Merkel/Sarkozy also then bought precious time in order for their domestic banks to seek for cover or silently get rid of their positions
-
-
-
-
-
-
Philippe
On 7 Sep, 2012
So, the ESM will buy the primary issuance of troubled countries and the ECB will buy on the secondary market, ..It may have a psychological side effect ( you don't want to be short a bond for which the central bank would be willing to set a floor ), but I'm curious about the secondary effects (focus on short maturities, ECB balance sheet quality, velocity of money, more countries putting themselves on the monettary dole ... ). If the move of a butterfly can distort the market, what does happen when you answer that distortion with an even greater distortion ? answers in our lifetime...
They could have called this Troubled Sovereign Assets Relief Program. -
christof Govaerts
On 7 Sep, 2012
@Philippe
Nice one on T(S)ARP Philippe ; in a previous posting I had my doubts as well on the 3y max maturity. But that was probably the max they could agree upon in order for the Buba to play along. It's still possible however that market mechanics flatten the curve (cfr postings this week) but investors most likely await more confo from governments and EU decisions before stepping into this adventure. Mind you, if it works, long Italian bonds still offer you a good run for your money and ALM funds (pension, insurers) desperately need some kind of coupon right now. -
Theo
On 7 Sep, 2012
Apparently my Banker won
Now let's see who is going to tango with the ECB -
Joeri
On 7 Sep, 2012
From Goldmans on sterilisation:
"Purchases will concentrate on bonds with a maturity from one to three years, and will be fully sterilised. The ECB is already sterilising the purchases made under the SMP through weekly reverse tenders. These tenders drain the amount of money from the banking system that the ECB spent on buying peripheral bonds. The specifics of how OMT purchases will be sterilised have not been announced, but our base case is that they would take place in the same manner. The ECB will demonstrate greater transparency in publishing the magnitude, duration and country composition of the debt holdings accumulated under the OMT."-
christof Govaerts
On 7 Sep, 2012
@Joeri
Exactly, via reverse repos or term deposits or whatever. But like I said, if these term deposits can be used as collateral for other banking purposes, it's not really a sterilized operation in banking and potential leverage terms. For ECB definition it is however
-
-
Theo
On 7 Sep, 2012
So what was that question at the presser about buying not only new issue sovereign bonds with 1-3 year maturity, but also existing, old bond, with remaining 1-3 year maturity ?
Is that about sovereign bonds which were issued at the start of the euro (back then much higher rates) ?-
christof Govaerts
On 7 Sep, 2012
@Theo
Yes you are right on that. So the new issues on 1-3 will most likely be immediately bought by ECB if necessary on the secondary market (FED has been doing the sale thing since 2008). In the mean time and to have an effect as deep as possible, the ECB will buy existing older bonds which have a remaining maturity. Carry trades will/could do the trick to flatten the curve, a kind of operation twist executed by banks and others. That's the plan and so far so good but we still have some miles to run. It's now over to Mr Market Marathon Man
-
















